<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>EdTribune SC - South Carolina Education Data</title><description>Data-driven education journalism for South Carolina. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Nearly Half of SC Districts Hit Record Lows</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-04-09-sc-63-districts-all-time-low/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-04-09-sc-63-districts-all-time-low/</guid><description>38 of South Carolina&apos;s 81 school districts recorded their lowest enrollment in 12 years in 2025-26, while 64 declined and only 7 reached highs.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/richland-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Richland 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; enrolled 21,468 students this year. That is fewer than any year since at least 2014-15, a loss of 3,088 from its 12-year peak. It is not alone. Thirty-eight of South Carolina&apos;s 81 school districts recorded their lowest enrollment in at least a dozen years in 2025-26, and 64 of 81 declined. Only seven districts are at all-time highs. Two of those are charter operators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2025-26 school year erased South Carolina&apos;s post-COVID recovery in a single stroke. The state dropped from 796,780 students to 789,086, a loss of 7,694 students (0.97%). That is the largest non-COVID decline in the data window. But the state-level figure understates how widespread the damage is: nearly four out of every five districts shrank, and the losses span every region of the state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-09-sc-63-districts-all-time-low-status.png&quot; alt=&quot;District enrollment status in 2025-26&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The districts that hit bottom&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 38 districts at record lows are not a homogeneous group. The list includes large suburban systems like &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/beaufort-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Beaufort 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (20,819 students, down 7.0% from peak) and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/lexington-05&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Lexington 05&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (16,452, down 6.0%), mid-sized districts like &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/sumter-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Sumter 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (13,314, down 22.6%), and rural districts that have been emptying for over a decade.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The deepest losses, measured as percentage decline from peak enrollment, concentrate along the I-95 Corridor. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/mccormick-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;McCormick 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has lost 42.2% of its students since its 12-year high, falling from 835 to 483. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/lee-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Lee 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is down 42.1%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/williamsburg-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Williamsburg 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lost 41.6%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/allendale-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Allendale 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lost 40.3%, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/colleton-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Colleton 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lost 30.3%. These are the same communities named in the landmark &lt;em&gt;Abbeville v. State of South Carolina&lt;/em&gt; lawsuit over education funding adequacy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-09-sc-63-districts-all-time-low-deepest.png&quot; alt=&quot;Deepest declines from peak enrollment&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Six districts have declined every single year in the 12-year data window, an unbroken 11-year streak of losses: Colleton 01, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/darlington-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Darlington 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/fairfield-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Fairfield 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, McCormick 01, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/marion-10&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Marion 10&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and Williamsburg 01. Three more districts are in 10-year decline streaks. For a district like McCormick, which now enrolls just 483 students, each year of further loss raises an existential question about whether the district can sustain independent operations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-09-sc-63-districts-all-time-low-largest.png&quot; alt=&quot;Largest districts at record lows&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The flippers: growth reversed overnight&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seventeen districts that grew in 2024-25 reversed course and declined in 2025-26. The largest flippers were among the state&apos;s biggest systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/charleston-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Charleston 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; gained 458 students last year and lost 800 this year. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/horry-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Horry 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; gained 457 and lost 649. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/berkeley-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Berkeley 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; gained 319 and lost 97. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/york-04&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;York 04&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, a Charlotte-metro spillover district that grew 50.5% from 12,256 to 18,445 between 2015 and 2025, lost 321 students in a single year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are not rural systems in long-term decline. They are coastal and suburban districts that had been carrying the state&apos;s enrollment recovery. Their simultaneous reversal in 2025-26 signals something more structural than a one-year fluctuation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-09-sc-63-districts-all-time-low-flippers.png&quot; alt=&quot;Districts that flipped from growth to decline&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Horry County, one of the &lt;a href=&quot;https://dew.sc.gov/labor-market-information-blog/2025-05/2024-population-estimates-migration-drives-rapid-growth-south&quot;&gt;fastest-growing counties in the nation&lt;/a&gt; with 3.8% population growth, is losing public school students even as residents pour in. Horry County Schools &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.myhorrynews.com/news/horry-county-schools-examines-enrollment-trends-and-rise-in-student-withdrawals/article_0c40c3a3-0165-4bfa-b1fe-c18ac16f9bb1.html&quot;&gt;reported 3,353 student withdrawals&lt;/a&gt; since the start of the school year, with the largest share of departing families citing a desire for &quot;more options.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Where the students went&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seven districts at all-time highs tell part of the story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/charter-institute-at-erskine&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Charter Institute at Erskine&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; gained 2,362 students to reach 28,376, making it the fastest-growing district entity in the state. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/limestone-charter-association&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Limestone Charter Association&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; added 1,263 to reach 8,650. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/sc-public-charter&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;SC Public Charter School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; gained 732 to reach 22,115. Together, the three charter operators added 4,357 students in 2025-26, absorbing 57% of the 7,694-student net state loss.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charter operator enrollment has grown from 17,024 in 2015 to 59,141 in 2026, a 247% increase. That growth accelerated sharply after 2020: charter operators enrolled 30,764 students in 2019-20 and nearly doubled to 59,141 by 2025-26.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only traditional districts at all-time highs were &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/spartanburg-02&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Spartanburg 02&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (12,143), &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/spartanburg-05&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Spartanburg 05&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (11,230), &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/anderson-04&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Anderson 04&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3,113), &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/spartanburg-04&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Spartanburg 04&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3,007), and the Governor&apos;s School for Agriculture at John De La Howe (91 students). Three of the five are Spartanburg County subdivisions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina&apos;s Education Scholarship Trust Fund, launched in 2024, adds another channel. All &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/programs/south-carolina-education-scholarship-trust-fund-program/&quot;&gt;10,000 scholarships for 2025-26 were awarded&lt;/a&gt;, each worth $7,500. The program cap rises to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ed.sc.gov/newsroom/strategic-engagement/education-scholarship-trust-fund-program/&quot;&gt;at least 15,000 for 2026-27&lt;/a&gt;, with eligibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/programs/south-carolina-education-scholarship-trust-fund-program/&quot;&gt;expanding from 300% to 500% of the federal poverty level&lt;/a&gt;. Not every ESTF recipient is a former public school student, but the program&apos;s rapid scale-up coincides precisely with the sharpest enrollment contraction in the state&apos;s recent history.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Fiscal pressure follows the headcount&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina funds districts through a weighted pupil formula tied to Average Daily Membership. When enrollment drops, state funding follows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/greenville-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greenville 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the state&apos;s largest district at 76,398 students, lost 1,376 students in 2025-26 after losing 590 in 2024-25, back-to-back declines after years of growth. With more than 40% of local public school funding tied to headcount, those losses translate directly into fewer teaching positions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What this is, is a disparity in State Aid to Classroom funding that gives charter school students ten times more in new money than traditional public schools.&quot;
-- &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.foxcarolina.com/2025/05/09/state-aid-classrooms-causing-budget-controversy-among-traditional-charter-upstate-schools/&quot;&gt;Tim Waller, Greenville County Schools media director, Fox Carolina, May 2025&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the 2025-26 state budget, approximately &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.foxcarolina.com/2025/05/09/state-aid-classrooms-causing-budget-controversy-among-traditional-charter-upstate-schools/&quot;&gt;$90 million in State Aid to Classrooms funding went to charter schools&lt;/a&gt; serving roughly 57,000 students, about $1,500 per student. Traditional districts serving roughly 710,000 students received approximately $22 million, about $30 per student. Charter leaders argue the disparity reflects their lack of access to local property tax revenue; traditional district leaders call it a structural inequity that compounds enrollment-driven funding losses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The pipeline question&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2025-26 reversal is hard to dismiss as a temporary correction. South Carolina&apos;s pre-COVID growth pattern was steady: the state added 30,203 students between 2015 and 2020, growing every year. COVID erased 20,250 of those students in a single year. The recovery was real, with the state clawing back to a peak of 796,780 by 2025. Then the 2025-26 cliff dropped enrollment below the 2023-24 level.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sixty-four of 81 districts declined. The 17 that grew added a combined 5,279 students. The 64 that shrank lost 12,973. That 2.5-to-1 ratio between losses and gains means the state&apos;s enrollment trajectory now depends on whether charter operator growth can continue to offset traditional district losses, and whether the ESTF program accelerates the migration or merely absorbs students who would have left anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The distinction matters for districts like Sumter 01, which has declined for 10 consecutive years, losing 3,878 students (22.6%) from its peak. For a district already at its smallest, another year of loss does not simply shrink the budget proportionally. It creates per-student cost increases as fixed costs for transportation, facilities, and administration spread across fewer students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-09-sc-63-districts-all-time-low-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Districts at record low count by year&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number of districts at record lows spiked to 62 during COVID&apos;s nadir in 2020-21, then fell to 33 by 2022-23 as recovery took hold. It has now climbed back to 38 and rising, without a pandemic to blame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>enrollment</category></item><item><title>South Carolina&apos;s Homeless Absence Rate Has Not Budged in Four Years</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-04-08-sc-homeless-half-absent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-04-08-sc-homeless-half-absent/</guid><description>Homeless students in SC have a 48.7% chronic absenteeism rate that has barely budged in four years, while foster care students are getting worse.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series: South Carolina Chronic Absenteeism 2024-25.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every morning across South Carolina, 13,919 students classified as homeless wake up in shelters, motels, doubled-up apartments, or cars and try to get themselves to school. Nearly half of them do not make it often enough. The chronic absenteeism rate for homeless students hit 48.7% in 2024-25, a figure so high that it effectively means a coin flip determines whether a homeless child in South Carolina will miss more than a month of school in any given year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What makes the number alarming is not just its magnitude but its stubbornness. Four years of data tell a flat line where there should be improvement: 46.1% in 2021-22, 48.8% in 2022-23, 48.5% in 2023-24, and 48.7% in 2024-25. The state&apos;s overall chronic rate peaked at 24.8% in 2022-23 before falling to 22.3%, though it remains above the 20.4% rate when the data begins in 2021-22. For homeless students, the needle barely moved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A growing population and a widening count&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-08-sc-homeless-half-absent-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Vulnerable populations trend&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gap between homeless students and the general population has widened from 25.7 percentage points in 2021-22 to 26.4 points in 2024-25. And it is a gap applied to a larger base: the number of students identified as homeless grew from 11,080 in 2021-22 to 13,919 in 2024-25, a 25.6% increase. In raw terms, that means 6,771 homeless students were chronically absent last year, up from 5,109 four years earlier, an increase of 1,662 students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-08-sc-homeless-half-absent-count.png&quot; alt=&quot;Homeless enrollment and chronic absence&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The McKinney-Vento Act, which guarantees educational rights for homeless students, requires schools to provide transportation, immediate enrollment, and access to services. South Carolina&apos;s data suggests that even with those protections, the sheer instability of homelessness overwhelms any intervention school districts can provide. A student who moved three times during the school year and does not have consistent transportation is going to miss school, regardless of what the attendance plan says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Foster care: heading the wrong direction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If homeless students represent a crisis frozen in place, foster care students represent one that is actively worsening. Their chronic absenteeism rate was 29.0% in 2021-22. By 2024-25, it reached 42.4%, a 13.4 percentage point increase that is the worst trajectory of any student subgroup in South Carolina.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-08-sc-homeless-half-absent-foster.png&quot; alt=&quot;Foster care chronic absenteeism&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2024-25 jump alone was striking: a 5.4 point increase from 37.0% to 42.4%, the largest single-year increase of any subgroup. This happened even as the foster care population itself shrank dramatically, from 5,892 students to 3,192 over four years, a 45.8% decline. The students who remain in foster care are, by this measure, those with the most severe barriers to attendance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Foster care placement changes mean school changes. School changes mean lost relationships, new bus routes, unfamiliar classrooms, and a child who may simply stop trying to navigate the system. With 1,352 foster students chronically absent in 2024-25, the numbers are smaller than for homeless students, but the trajectory is more dire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The achievement connection&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://informedsc.org/chronic-absenteeism-public-schools-south-carolina/&quot;&gt;InformEd SC data&lt;/a&gt; puts the academic stakes in sharp terms: only 23% of chronically absent students in grades 3 through 8 are at grade level in math, compared to 47% of students with regular attendance. For homeless and foster care students, who already face achievement gaps from instability, chronic absenteeism compounds the disadvantage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state doubled its school-based mental health counselors from 600 to 1,209 between 2022 and the 2023-24 school year. That addresses one thread of the problem. But a counselor cannot drive a child from this week&apos;s motel to last week&apos;s school. A counselor cannot prevent the third placement change in a semester for a foster child who has stopped unpacking their backpack. The barriers for these students begin before they reach the school building, and that is where they must be met.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>equity</category></item><item><title>How a Small College Built SC&apos;s Sixth-Largest School District</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-04-02-sc-erskine-charter-explosion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-04-02-sc-erskine-charter-explosion/</guid><description>The Charter Institute at Erskine grew from 8,450 to 28,376 students in seven years, becoming SC&apos;s sixth-largest district.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series: SC 2025-26 Enrollment.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Erskine College is a 187-year-old liberal arts school in Due West, South Carolina, a town of fewer than 3,000 people. In 2017, it declared itself a charter school authorizer, a move permitted under state law but anticipated by no one in the Legislature. By 2025-26, the &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/charter-institute-at-erskine&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Charter Institute at Erskine&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; enrolls 28,376 students across 28 schools statewide, making it the sixth-largest school district in South Carolina. Two students separate it from &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/richland-02&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Richland 02&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the fifth-largest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seven years ago, it enrolled 8,450.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A 235.8% Surge, Mostly in One Year&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The growth trajectory reveals a critical detail often lost in the headline number. Erskine did not add 19,926 students gradually. In a single year, between 2019-20 and 2020-21, enrollment jumped from 10,003 to 23,750, a gain of 13,747 students, or 137.4%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-02-sc-erskine-charter-explosion-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Charter Institute at Erskine enrollment trend, 2019-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That spike coincided with a reorganization of the charter sector. The &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/sc-public-charter&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;SC Public Charter School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the state&apos;s original charter authorizer, saw enrollment drop from 20,761 to 15,773 in the same year. Schools moved between authorizers, carrying their students with them. The net effect: Erskine absorbed a substantial share of the existing charter sector rather than growing purely through new enrollment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since that reorganization, Erskine has continued to grow, adding 4,626 students from 2021 to 2026, a 19.5% increase over five years. That is real expansion, but it is a different story than 235.8% growth implies. The headline number reflects a structural rearrangement layered on top of genuine enrollment gains.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Authorizer Landscape&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina&apos;s charter sector runs through three operators. Their trajectories are starkly different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-02-sc-erskine-charter-explosion-operators.png&quot; alt=&quot;Three charter operators enrollment comparison, 2015-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SC Public Charter School District, established by the Legislature and governed by a state-appointed board, grew steadily from 17,024 in 2015 to 25,873 in 2018. Then it contracted, dropping to 15,773 by 2021 as schools transferred to Erskine. It has since recovered to 22,115, essentially flat over 12 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/limestone-charter-association&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Limestone Charter Association&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, authorized by Limestone University, appeared in the data in 2023 with 1,888 students and grew to 8,650 by 2026, a 358.2% increase. But Limestone University &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/aikenstandard/education-lab/limestone-closure-charter-schools-uncertain-erskine-voorhees/article_7eb5239f-b4f3-4569-af55-4e8054140b3b.html&quot;&gt;closed in May 2025&lt;/a&gt;, leaving its 13 schools to find new sponsors. Most &lt;a href=&quot;https://sccharter.org/district-news/board-approves-transfer-of-limestone-charter-association-schools/&quot;&gt;transferred to the SC Public Charter School District&lt;/a&gt;, carrying roughly &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/education-lab/sc-charter-sponsor-limestone-shutdown/article_3c0dd689-5673-4991-8ca3-ad5015978a4b.html&quot;&gt;$99.4 million in state funding&lt;/a&gt;. Limestone&apos;s explosive growth curve will end as abruptly as it began.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Combined, the three charter operators enrolled 59,141 students in 2025-26, or 7.5% of South Carolina&apos;s total enrollment. In 2015, one operator enrolled 17,024 students, 2.2% of the total. The charter share has more than tripled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-02-sc-erskine-charter-explosion-share.png&quot; alt=&quot;Charter share of SC total enrollment, 2015-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Where the Students Came From&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The charter sector gained 30,378 students between 2019 and 2026. Traditional districts lost 22,785 over the same period. The state&apos;s total enrollment rose by 7,593, meaning charter growth did not merely absorb the state&apos;s overall gains. It exceeded them by a factor of four.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-02-sc-erskine-charter-explosion-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;Year-over-year enrollment change by sector, 2016-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among traditional districts, 49 of 68 lost students from 2019 to 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/sumter-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Sumter 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lost the most in absolute terms: 3,273 students, a 19.7% decline. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/berkeley-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Berkeley 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/horry-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Horry 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, two of the state&apos;s largest districts, gained 3,135 and 2,907 respectively, but those gains mask a broader contraction across the traditional sector.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is not possible to determine from enrollment data alone how many of those traditional-district losses represent families choosing charter schools versus families leaving the state, shifting to private schools, or choosing homeschooling. The charter sector&apos;s growth and the traditional sector&apos;s decline are parallel trends, not necessarily a direct transfer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;How Erskine Became a District&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina law allows institutions of higher education to authorize charter schools. The provision was designed for research universities partnering with laboratory schools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/editorials/sc-charter-school-loophole-erskine-audit/article_a21de1b7-f682-4e2d-ac75-c75b245ad338.html&quot;&gt;No one anticipated&lt;/a&gt; that a small private college would use it to build a statewide network of dozens of schools across multiple counties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;State law allows authorizers to retain 2% of state aid flowing to the schools they sponsor. For Erskine, with 28,376 students, that &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fitsnews.com/2025/11/20/s-c-audit-clears-erskine-charter-institute-of-favoritism-preferential-treatment/&quot;&gt;amounts to roughly $5.6 million per year&lt;/a&gt;. The S.C. Legislative Audit Council &lt;a href=&quot;https://lac.sc.gov/sites/lac/files/Documents/Legislative%20Audit%20Council/Reports/A-K/CIE-2025.pdf&quot;&gt;completed a review in 2025&lt;/a&gt;, clearing the institute of favoritism and conflicts of interest but flagging $820,000 in travel spending between 2023 and 2025.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;No one in the Legislature anticipated that a private college would declare itself a charter school authorizer and, having done so, appropriate for itself tax funds to distribute to as many charter schools as it chose to authorize.&quot;
— &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/editorials/sc-charter-school-loophole-erskine-audit/article_a21de1b7-f682-4e2d-ac75-c75b245ad338.html&quot;&gt;The Post and Courier, Dec. 4, 2025&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The audit&apos;s &quot;all clear&quot; on legal compliance did not quiet critics. Stanford&apos;s CREDO, in its &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.statehousereport.com/2024/08/09/big-story-weak-state-charter-law-led-to-underperforming-schools-critics-say/&quot;&gt;2023 national charter study&lt;/a&gt;, found South Carolina charter students underperforming their peers in both reading and math, one of only three states where charter students did not outperform traditional public school students. The state Senate &lt;a href=&quot;https://scdailygazette.com/2026/02/10/sc-senate-passes-bill-creating-more-oversight-for-charter-schools/&quot;&gt;passed a bill in February 2026&lt;/a&gt; creating additional oversight for charter school authorizers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Erskine&apos;s Student Body&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Erskine&apos;s demographic profile diverges from the state as a whole. The institute&apos;s student body is 56.1% white, compared with 45.8% statewide. Black students make up 25.1% of Erskine&apos;s enrollment versus 30.0% statewide. Hispanic students: 10.1% versus 14.8%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The economic profile is closer to the state average: 55.1% of Erskine students are classified as economically disadvantaged, compared with 59.9% statewide. This is not a sector serving exclusively affluent families, though it does skew whiter than the state&apos;s public school population as a whole.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Sixth-Largest District&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-04-02-sc-erskine-charter-explosion-rank.png&quot; alt=&quot;SC&apos;s largest districts by enrollment, 2025-26&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/greenville-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greenville 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the state&apos;s largest traditional district at 76,398 students, is nearly three times Erskine&apos;s size. But Erskine is larger than 93.1% of South Carolina&apos;s traditional districts. It enrolls more students than Aiken 01 (22,742), more than Dorchester 02 (25,716), and more than five of the seven individual Spartanburg districts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new funding bill, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fitsnews.com/2026/01/30/money-following-the-child-an-important-first-step-in-south-carolina/&quot;&gt;Senate Bill 774&lt;/a&gt;, would require the Department of Education to redirect local revenue per pupil from traditional districts to charter authorizers for each student attending a charter school. The bill would affect 70,000 to 80,000 students statewide. If enacted, it would formalize the financial transfer that charter growth already represents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What Happens Next&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The charter sector is projected to keep growing. Erskine alone plans to add at least &lt;a href=&quot;https://erskinecharters.org/2024/06/three-new-applicant-teams-welcomed-to-the-institute-family/&quot;&gt;eight new schools&lt;/a&gt; in the coming academic year, with projections to reach 40,000 students. The Limestone schools that transferred to the SC Public Charter School District will inflate that operator&apos;s numbers in future years. The combined charter share could approach 10% within two to three years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A school building does not get cheaper to heat when 50 students leave. A bus route does not shorten. Per-pupil funding follows departing students, but the superintendent&apos;s salary, the bus fleet, and the boiler bill do not scale down. In a state where 49 of 68 traditional districts shrank over the past seven years, charter growth is no longer a policy experiment. It is the second-largest enrollment story in South Carolina.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>school-choice</category></item><item><title>One in Seven SC Students Is Now Hispanic</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-26-sc-hispanic-nearly-doubled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-26-sc-hispanic-nearly-doubled/</guid><description>Hispanic enrollment in SC nearly doubled in 11 years, from 60,023 to 116,754. Without that growth, the state would have lost students.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In Saluda, a small town west of Columbia where the school district has added 436 students over the past decade, nearly half the 2,600 enrolled children are Hispanic or Latino. Six bilingual graduates from the Class of 2023 have returned to teach in the district where they grew up. This is not an isolated curiosity. It is the leading edge of the largest demographic transformation in South Carolina&apos;s public school history.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hispanic enrollment has grown from 60,023 students in 2014-15 to 116,754 in 2025-26, a 94.5% increase that makes it the only major racial group adding students at scale. The growth has been unbroken: 11 consecutive years of gains, through recessions, a pandemic, and a statewide enrollment reversal. Without Hispanic enrollment growth, South Carolina would have lost 24,511 students over this period instead of gaining 32,220.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;From 8% to nearly 15%&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hispanic students represented 7.9% of South Carolina&apos;s enrollment in 2014-15. By 2025-26, that share has reached 14.8%, nearly one in seven students statewide. The growth is accelerating: the first half of the data window (2015 to 2020) added 2.9 percentage points of share, while the second half (2020 to 2026) added 4.0 points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-26-sc-hispanic-nearly-doubled-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Hispanic enrollment trend in South Carolina, 2014-15 to 2025-26&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scale of the shift becomes clearer in context. Over the same 11 years, white enrollment fell by 30,633 students (-7.8%) and Black enrollment fell by 41,256 (-14.9%). Asian enrollment was essentially flat at around 15,400. Multiracial students, tracked since 2017, grew 73.2%. But no group comes close to matching the Hispanic trajectory in either absolute numbers or growth rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number of districts where Hispanic students make up more than 10% of enrollment has jumped from 10 in 2015 to 36 in 2026. Four districts now have Hispanic shares above 30%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-26-sc-hispanic-nearly-doubled-shares.png&quot; alt=&quot;Racial composition share trends in SC, showing the closing gap&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Poultry plants, construction sites, resort towns&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The growth is not evenly distributed. It follows three economic corridors that have drawn Latino workers and families to South Carolina over the past two decades.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/jasper-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Jasper 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, a small Lowcountry district near the Georgia border, Hispanic share jumped from 25.3% to 58.4%, a 33-percentage-point gain that makes it the most heavily Hispanic public school district in the state. Jasper County was the &lt;a href=&quot;https://dew.sc.gov/labor-market-information-blog/2025-05/2024-population-estimates-migration-drives-rapid-growth-south&quot;&gt;third-fastest-growing county in the nation in 2024&lt;/a&gt;, with 5.9% population growth driven largely by construction and hospitality employment tied to the Lowcountry&apos;s building boom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/saluda-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Saluda 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, where Hispanic share climbed from 31.9% to 48.0%, is a different story. Mexican and Guatemalan immigrants began arriving in the late 1990s for jobs at poultry processing plants and produce farms. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/saluda-south-carolina-hispanic-migrants/&quot;&gt;A PBS Frontline investigation&lt;/a&gt; documented how the town of Saluda itself is now majority Hispanic, with the school district spending $600,000 over five years on multilingual teaching staff and $285,000 on translators. Voters approved a $49 million bond referendum in 2022 to expand and renovate schools that were bursting at capacity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We welcome all kids.&quot;
-- Harvey Livingston, Saluda County Schools superintendent, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/saluda-south-carolina-hispanic-migrants/&quot;&gt;PBS Frontline&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The coastal tourism corridor tells a third version. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/horry-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Horry 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, home to Myrtle Beach, saw its Hispanic enrollment jump from 4,064 to 9,305, a 129% increase that pushed Hispanic share from 9.6% to 19.4%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/beaufort-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Beaufort 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, anchored by Hilton Head Island&apos;s resort economy, holds the largest Hispanic share among major districts at 33.2%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The big districts are transforming too&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The geographic concentration in small agricultural and tourism communities is well documented. Less discussed is the scale of change in South Carolina&apos;s largest school systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/greenville-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greenville 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the state&apos;s largest district, added 6,764 Hispanic students since 2015, more than any other district in absolute terms. Hispanic share there rose from 14.0% to 22.7%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/charleston-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Charleston 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; added 4,748 Hispanic students (+124.3%), pushing its share from 8.1% to 17.1%. Berkeley 01 added 3,851 (+132.5%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across these three coastal and Upstate metro districts alone, Hispanic enrollment grew by 15,363 students. That is more than the entire Hispanic enrollment of 40 of the state&apos;s 82 traditional districts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-26-sc-hispanic-nearly-doubled-districts.png&quot; alt=&quot;Districts with the largest percentage-point gains in Hispanic share&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The gap that keeps closing&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2014-15, Black students outnumbered Hispanic students by 217,762. That gap has narrowed to 119,775, a 45% reduction in 11 years. The convergence is driven from both directions: Black enrollment declined by 41,256 while Hispanic enrollment rose by 56,731.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-26-sc-hispanic-nearly-doubled-gap.png&quot; alt=&quot;Black vs. Hispanic enrollment trend showing convergence&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the current trajectory, where Hispanic enrollment gains roughly 5,200 students per year and Black enrollment loses about 3,800, the two lines would cross sometime around 2035. That projection is crude. But the direction is unambiguous: Hispanic students are on a path to become South Carolina&apos;s second-largest racial group within the next decade, a reordering of the state&apos;s demographic hierarchy that has no precedent in its school data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Growth slowed sharply in 2026&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The year-over-year data introduces a caveat to the acceleration narrative. After adding 8,877 Hispanic students in 2024-25, the largest single-year gain in the data, growth dropped to 2,160 in 2025-26. That is the smallest gain since the COVID-disrupted year of 2020-21, when the increase was 2,039.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-26-sc-hispanic-nearly-doubled-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;Year-over-year Hispanic enrollment changes&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2025-26 slowdown coincides with South Carolina&apos;s broader enrollment cliff: the state lost 7,694 students overall, its first non-COVID decline in the data window. Smaller kindergarten cohorts born during the pandemic may have begun to temper Hispanic growth. Federal immigration enforcement in 2025 may have depressed enrollment among families uncertain of their status. Both forces are plausible. Both could be acting simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What it means for classrooms&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The instructional implications are substantial. South Carolina was home to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.colorincolorado.org/south-carolina-ell-resources&quot;&gt;nearly 66,719 English language learners in 2022&lt;/a&gt;, and the overlap between Hispanic enrollment and EL identification is significant. The state&apos;s EL data, available only through 2024-25, shows the need for multilingual instruction growing faster than the teaching workforce can supply it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Saluda model, where districts invest in bilingual staff and grow their own teachers from the community, represents one approach. But Saluda is a district of 2,600 students. Greenville, with 17,348 Hispanic students and growing, faces the same challenge at an entirely different scale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina is advancing policy in this direction. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/bills/3637.htm&quot;&gt;Legislation introduced for the 2025-26 session&lt;/a&gt; establishes educational standards for Spanish instruction beginning with the 2026-27 school year. Whether that translates into staffing capacity quickly enough to keep pace with enrollment growth is the open question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 56,731 additional Hispanic students who entered South Carolina&apos;s public schools over the past 11 years represent the single largest source of enrollment growth in the state. Without them, South Carolina&apos;s student population would be smaller today than it was in 2015. The next decade will test whether the school systems that absorbed this growth can serve these students as well as they counted them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>demographics</category></item><item><title>Six SC Districts Have Declined Every Year for 11 Straight Years</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-19-sc-corridor-of-shame-11yr-decline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-19-sc-corridor-of-shame-11yr-decline/</guid><description>Colleton, Darlington, Fairfield, McCormick, Marion, and Williamsburg have lost a combined 8,634 students since 2015. All six are at all-time lows.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/mccormick-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;McCormick 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; enrolled 483 students in 2025-26. That is roughly 37 per grade. The district has lost students every single year for 11 consecutive years, shedding 42.2% of its enrollment since 2014-15. It is not alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five other South Carolina districts share that distinction: &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/colleton-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Colleton 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/darlington-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Darlington 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/fairfield-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Fairfield 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/marion-10&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Marion 10&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/williamsburg-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Williamsburg 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Each has declined every year in the 12-year data window, an 11-year streak of unbroken loss with no sign of stabilization. Combined, the six have gone from 29,636 students to 21,002, a 29.1% decline. All six hit all-time lows in 2025-26.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are not random points on the map. They trace the I-95 corridor through South Carolina&apos;s rural interior, the same stretch of counties that gave rise to the term &quot;Corridor of Shame&quot; and the landmark &lt;em&gt;Abbeville County School District v. State of South Carolina&lt;/em&gt; lawsuit over whether the state was meeting its constitutional obligation to educate children in its poorest communities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-19-sc-corridor-of-shame-11yr-decline-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Six Districts, 11 Years of Decline&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The gap that keeps widening&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina&apos;s statewide enrollment grew 4.3% between 2014-15 and 2025-26, from 756,866 to 789,086. Coastal boomtowns, Charlotte spillover communities, and charter operators drove that growth. The six corridor districts moved in the opposite direction, and the divergence is accelerating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first five years of the window (2016 through 2020), the six districts lost an average of 679 students per year. In the six years since (2021 through 2026), the average annual loss rose to 874. The worst year was 2020-21, when COVID pushed the combined loss to 1,451. But 2025-26 was nearly as bad: 1,305 students gone, the second-largest single-year loss on record, with no pandemic to blame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The corridor&apos;s share of statewide enrollment has shrunk from 3.9% to 2.7%. That may sound small, but it represents a structural shift: these districts are losing fiscal and political weight at the same time they need resources most.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-19-sc-corridor-of-shame-11yr-decline-vs-state.png&quot; alt=&quot;Corridor vs. State: A Widening Gap&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;District by district&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The six districts share a direction but not a speed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCormick&apos;s 42.2% loss is the steepest, but the district started so small (835 students in 2014-15) that its absolute loss of 352 students is the smallest of the group. At 483, McCormick is approaching the threshold where maintaining a full K-12 program becomes structurally difficult.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/williamsburg-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Williamsburg&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has lost 41.6%, falling from 4,423 to 2,581. Marion has lost 30.2%, Colleton 30.3%. Fairfield, the county between Columbia and Charlotte that state population projections say &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/columbia/fairfield-county-population-growth-2042-sc/article_4dc8c440-4b71-11ef-a8b4-678ac0436c1f.html&quot;&gt;could lose 38% of its residents by 2042&lt;/a&gt;, has lost 29.8% of its students already. Darlington, the largest of the six at 8,184 students, has lost 21.4%, a slower rate but representing the most students in raw terms: 2,223.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-19-sc-corridor-of-shame-11yr-decline-bars.png&quot; alt=&quot;How Much Each District Has Lost&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The year-over-year pattern is striking for what it does not contain: a single year of growth for any of these districts. Every bar in the chart below points the same direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-19-sc-corridor-of-shame-11yr-decline-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;No Respite: Losses Every Single Year&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The lawsuit that went nowhere&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 1993, 36 of South Carolina&apos;s poorest school districts sued the state, arguing it had failed to provide a &quot;minimally adequate education.&quot; The case, &lt;em&gt;Abbeville County School District v. State of South Carolina&lt;/em&gt;, became the longest trial in the state&apos;s history. In 2014, the South Carolina Supreme Court &lt;a href=&quot;https://law.justia.com/cases/south-carolina/supreme-court/2014/27466.html&quot;&gt;ruled 3-2&lt;/a&gt; that the state bore primary responsibility and had &quot;failed in their constitutional duty.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three years later, the same court &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/decades-old-education-funding-lawsuit-ended-by-south-carolina-supreme-court/article_9c17bb6e-ce10-11e7-b027-078bc5f854e6.html&quot;&gt;reversed course&lt;/a&gt;. In November 2017, a new 3-2 majority vacated the ruling, holding that the original decision &quot;was wrongly decided as violative of separation of powers.&quot; The court released legislators from oversight and ended its jurisdiction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;https://archive.org/details/CorridorOfShameNeglectOfSouthCarolinasRuralSchools&quot;&gt;Corridor of Shame documentary&lt;/a&gt; that gave the region its name identified over 100,000 students enrolled across the 34 plaintiff districts, with 21 of those districts reporting 90% or higher participation in free and reduced-price lunch programs. The enrollment data shows that the underlying population base has continued to erode in the years since the lawsuit ended.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What is driving the losses&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most plausible driver is county-level population decline. These are rural counties where the economic base has narrowed: manufacturing closures, agricultural consolidation, and limited professional employment pull working-age adults toward Columbia, Charlotte, and the coast. Fairfield County&apos;s state population projections are &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/columbia/fairfield-county-population-growth-2042-sc/article_4dc8c440-4b71-11ef-a8b4-678ac0436c1f.html&quot;&gt;particularly grim&lt;/a&gt;, with state demographers projecting the county could lose more than a third of its population over the next two decades. McCormick County, which the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/mccormickcountysouthcarolina&quot;&gt;Census Bureau&lt;/a&gt; counts as the second-least populous county in South Carolina, is entirely rural by Census definition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;School choice expansion is a contributing factor, though difficult to quantify precisely. The &lt;a href=&quot;https://screportcards.com/overview/?q=eT0yMDIzJnQ9RCZzaWQ9NDcwMTAwMA&quot;&gt;Charter Institute at Erskine&lt;/a&gt;, a statewide charter authorizer, has grown from 8,450 students in 2018-19 to 28,376 in 2025-26. Some portion of that growth comes from families in rural districts choosing charter alternatives, though the data does not track individual student transfers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina&apos;s legislature has also moved toward &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/bills/3470.htm&quot;&gt;mandatory district consolidation&lt;/a&gt;. Bill H.3470, introduced in the 2025-26 session, would require every county to operate as a single school district by July 1, 2027, with further regional consolidation by 2032. For counties like McCormick, where a single district already covers the entire county, the bill changes nothing operationally. For the concept of small, independent rural districts as a category, it signals that the legislature has noticed the problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The demographic composition is shifting, too&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The corridor districts are not just shrinking. Their racial composition is changing. In 2014-15, Black students accounted for 51.3% of enrollment across the six districts. By 2025-26, that share had fallen to 46.8%, a decline of 5,358 students. White enrollment fell from 21.4% to 19.2%, a loss of 2,310. Hispanic enrollment has grown from 1.8% to 3.8%, but the absolute numbers are small: 524 to 798, a gain of 274 students that barely registers against the losses in other groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The net effect: the corridor districts are losing students from every major racial group. Hispanic growth is too small to offset Black and white losses, and the overall trajectory is one of depopulation across the board.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Not just six, but nine&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three more districts are in 10-year decline streaks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/florence-03&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Florence 03&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has lost 29.9% of its enrollment since 2015-16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/sumter-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Sumter 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the largest of the group at 13,314 students, has lost 22.6%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/greenwood-50&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greenwood 50&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has lost 9.0%, a slower rate but still 10 consecutive years without a single year of growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These nine districts, all at or near all-time lows, represent the leading edge of a pattern visible across rural South Carolina. Statewide, 38 of 81 districts recorded their lowest enrollment in at least 12 years in 2025-26.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-19-sc-corridor-of-shame-11yr-decline-facets.png&quot; alt=&quot;Every District, Same Direction&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What comes next&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCormick operates three schools for 483 students, roughly 37 per grade. The district&apos;s annual per-pupil spending, already well above the state average, rises with every departure because the buildings, the buses, and the superintendent do not scale down. Williamsburg, which had nearly 4,500 students a decade ago and now has 2,581, lost the enrollment base needed to sustain specialized programs years ago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Abbeville lawsuit asked whether the state owed these communities an adequate education. The Supreme Court said the courts could not answer that. The enrollment data offers a different verdict: six districts, 11 years, not one year of growth. Whatever the legal standard, the demographic arithmetic is running out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>district-spotlight</category></item><item><title>South Carolina&apos;s Recovery Is Over</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-12-sc-2026-cliff-recovery-over/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-12-sc-2026-cliff-recovery-over/</guid><description>After fully recovering from COVID and reaching a peak of 796,780 students, South Carolina lost 7,694 in a single year. The 800,000 milestone will not be reached.</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;South Carolina spent four years clawing back every student it lost to COVID. It recovered 148% of its pandemic losses, surpassing its pre-pandemic enrollment and reaching a record 796,780 students in 2024-25. Then, in a single year, it gave back 7,694 of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state now enrolls 789,086 students, a 1.0% decline that is both the largest non-COVID drop in the dataset and the only decline year outside the pandemic since records begin in 2014-15. South Carolina never reached 800,000. It came within 3,220 students of that milestone and turned around.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-12-sc-2026-cliff-recovery-over-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;South Carolina enrollment trend, 2015-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Four recovery years, then a cliff&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trajectory is worth spelling out. South Carolina grew steadily from 756,866 in 2014-15 to 787,069 in 2019-20, adding 30,203 students at roughly 5,000 to 8,000 per year. COVID cut 20,250 students in a single year, dropping enrollment to 766,819. The state bounced back with a 14,412-student surge in 2021-22, the strongest single-year gain in the dataset, followed by three more years of growth: 8,000, then 4,320, then 3,229.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each year of recovery was smaller than the last. The deceleration was visible by 2023-24, when gains dropped below 5,000 for the first time since the rebound began. By 2024-25, growth had slowed to 3,229 students, 0.4%. Then 2025-26 arrived with a loss of 7,694, larger than any two consecutive recovery years combined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-12-sc-2026-cliff-recovery-over-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;Year-over-year enrollment changes, 2016-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state remains 2,017 students above its 2019-20 pre-COVID level. But it sits 35,479 below where the pre-COVID growth trajectory (2014-15 through 2019-20) would have placed it, a gap that widened in 2025-26.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The pipeline is shrinking&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most likely driver of the reversal is demographic, not pandemic-related. Kindergarten enrollment has fallen 9.2% since 2014-15, from 58,359 to 52,969. Grade 12, meanwhile, has grown 21.7%, from 45,626 to 55,515. In 2024-25, for the first time in the dataset, South Carolina enrolled more 12th graders than kindergartners. The K-to-G12 ratio dropped from 127.9 in 2014-15 to 95.4 in 2025-26.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-12-sc-2026-cliff-recovery-over-pipeline.png&quot; alt=&quot;Kindergarten vs. Grade 12 enrollment, 2015-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a pipeline problem. Large graduating classes are leaving the system faster than smaller incoming cohorts can replace them. First grade is down 7.3% over the period, second grade down 5.8%. Every grade from third through 12th has grown. The system is top-heavy, and each year of 12th-grade departures removes a larger cohort than the kindergarten class entering at the bottom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina&apos;s fertility rate fell to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/data?reg=99&amp;amp;top=2&amp;amp;stop=1&amp;amp;lev=1&amp;amp;slev=4&amp;amp;obj=45&quot;&gt;55.8 per 1,000 women aged 15-44 in 2023&lt;/a&gt;, continuing a national trend of declining births. Children born in 2019-20, when &lt;a href=&quot;https://scdailygazette.com/2025/10/27/you-cant-fix-the-birth-rate-without-fixing-child-care/&quot;&gt;South Carolina&apos;s child care crisis was already deepening&lt;/a&gt;, are now entering kindergarten. The shrinking pipeline is not unique to South Carolina, but the state&apos;s abrupt reversal from growth to decline makes the structural shift harder to absorb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;61 districts lost students. Three charter operators gained.&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2025-26 decline hit 61 of the state&apos;s 81 districts. Only 16 gained students, and just 10 of those are traditional districts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/greenville-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greenville 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the state&apos;s largest district, led the losses with 1,376 fewer students, a 1.8% decline. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/charleston-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Charleston 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lost 800, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/horry-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Horry 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lost 649, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/darlington-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Darlington 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lost 609, a 6.9% drop that stands out for its severity in a mid-sized district enrolling just over 8,000. The five largest losses accounted for 32.7% of the total decline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Greenville County Schools has now lost students for two consecutive years, down from a peak of 78,364 in 2023-24. The district has &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/education-lab/greenville-schools-student-enrollment-down/article_854a727c-b7ec-422d-ba23-cc8f7ad1d378.html&quot;&gt;attributed&lt;/a&gt; some of the decline to charter competition, with 6,113 Greenville County students enrolled in charter schools, alongside a drop in kindergarten enrollment and a decline in students with limited English proficiency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The three charter operators, by contrast, added a combined 4,357 students. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/charter-institute-at-erskine&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Charter Institute at Erskine&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; grew by 2,362 (9.1%), Limestone Charter Association by 1,263 (17.1%), and SC Public Charter School District by 732 (3.4%). Charter operators accounted for 7.5% of total enrollment in 2025-26, up from 2.2% in 2014-15.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-12-sc-2026-cliff-recovery-over-districts.png&quot; alt=&quot;Largest district enrollment changes, 2025 to 2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Charter growth and the zero-sum question&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charter enrollment has more than tripled since 2014-15, rising from 17,024 to 59,141. Traditional district enrollment has moved in the opposite direction, declining from 739,842 to 729,945 over the same period, a loss of 9,897 students even as the state total grew by 32,220.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-12-sc-2026-cliff-recovery-over-charter.png&quot; alt=&quot;Charter district enrollment as % of total, 2015-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The charter share chart shows a discontinuity in 2021-22, when SC Public Charter School District did not report enrollment and Limestone Charter Association had not yet been established as a separate reporting entity. The 3.1% figure for that year understates the charter sector&apos;s actual size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether charter growth is pulling students from traditional districts or absorbing students who would otherwise leave public education entirely is an open question. Both dynamics are plausible. The &lt;a href=&quot;https://erskinecharters.org/&quot;&gt;Charter Institute at Erskine&lt;/a&gt; serves &lt;a href=&quot;https://erskinecharters.org/2025/01/institute-success-agenda/&quot;&gt;26 schools and 27,000 students&lt;/a&gt; and has positioned itself as the fastest-growing district-equivalent entity in the state, with 2,800 additional students in its approved new-school pipeline. At its current growth rate, the Institute alone will enroll more students than all but three traditional districts in the state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Separately, the state&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/programs/south-carolina-education-scholarship-trust-fund-program/&quot;&gt;Education Scholarship Trust Fund&lt;/a&gt; awarded 10,000 scholarships of $7,500 each for 2025-26, enabling families to use state funds for private school tuition and other educational expenses. The program is set to expand to 15,000 scholarships in 2026-27, with eligibility reaching 500% of the federal poverty level, roughly &lt;a href=&quot;https://excelinedinaction.org/2025/05/01/south-carolina-legislature-takes-action-to-improve-expand-school-choice/&quot;&gt;85% of South Carolina children&lt;/a&gt;. Whether the ESA program has materially affected public school enrollment is not yet clear from the data. A one-year, 7,694-student decline in a system of 789,086 could reflect ESA departures, pipeline shrinkage, or both.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Nearly half of all districts at a record low&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thirty-nine of the state&apos;s 81 districts, 48.1%, are at their lowest enrollment in the 12-year dataset. The list spans rural districts that have been declining for years, like Darlington 01 and Marlboro 01, and larger districts that peaked more recently, like &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/richland-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Richland 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 21,468 and Lexington 05 at 16,452.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only 17 of the 71 districts that lost students during COVID, 23.9%, have recovered to their pre-pandemic levels. South Carolina&apos;s statewide recovery masked the fact that most districts never fully recovered, and 2025-26 pushed many further from their pre-COVID baselines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Enrollment declines will hurt rural districts the hardest. Marlboro County isn&apos;t going to be the last district that faces this demographic problem.&quot;
— &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/editorials/sc-education-department-school-consolidations/article_e32684d1-1e0c-4cd2-99b0-ff4ecd279d9a.html&quot;&gt;Post and Courier, editorial&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://rfa.sc.gov/education-funding-dashboard&quot;&gt;Education Finance Act formula&lt;/a&gt; distributes state funds based on weighted pupil units. When enrollment drops, funding follows. For districts like Darlington, which lost 6.9% in a single year, the fiscal adjustment is not gradual. It is immediate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What to watch next&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2026-27 kindergarten cohort was born in 2020-21, when &lt;a href=&quot;https://stateofbabies.org/state/south-carolina/&quot;&gt;U.S. births dropped sharply&lt;/a&gt;. If that cohort is smaller than the current one, the decline accelerates. Meanwhile, the ESA program&apos;s expansion to 15,000 scholarships creates a second source of potential outflow from public schools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina spent four years proving that a state can fully recover from COVID enrollment losses. It took one year to prove that recovery and long-term growth are different things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>enrollment</category></item><item><title>White Students Fell Below 50% Seven Years Ago. The Gap Keeps Widening.</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-05-sc-majority-minority-accelerating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-03-05-sc-majority-minority-accelerating/</guid><description>South Carolina crossed the majority-minority threshold in 2019 and the shift is accelerating, driven by a 94.5% surge in Hispanic enrollment and a 14.9% drop in Black students.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In 2019, for the first time in the state&apos;s history, white students dropped below half of South Carolina&apos;s public school enrollment. That crossing was not a one-year anomaly. It was a hinge. In the seven years since, white share has fallen another 4.2 percentage points, from 49.98% to 45.76%, and the rate of decline is speeding up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Between 2015 and 2020, white share fell 2.3 points over five years. Between 2020 and 2026, it fell 3.7 points over six years, a 33% faster annual rate. This is not a state that tipped and stabilized. South Carolina is a state where the underlying demographic engine is still accelerating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The arithmetic under the headline&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statewide numbers mask a counterintuitive pattern: South Carolina&apos;s total enrollment actually grew 4.3% over this period, from 756,866 to 789,086. The state is gaining students. But the students it is gaining look nothing like the students it is losing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-05-sc-majority-minority-accelerating-shares.png&quot; alt=&quot;SC&apos;s racial composition, 2015-2026&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;White enrollment dropped by 30,633 students (-7.8%) since 2015. Black enrollment dropped by 41,256 students (-14.9%), a steeper decline in both absolute and percentage terms. Together, these two groups lost 71,889 students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hispanic enrollment nearly doubled over the same period. From 60,023 students in 2015 to 116,754 in 2026, a gain of 56,731 (+94.5%). Hispanic students went from 7.9% of enrollment to 14.8%. Multiracial students, tracked separately since 2017, added 21,312 (+73.2%). These two groups alone added 78,043 students, more than offsetting the combined white and Black losses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-05-sc-majority-minority-accelerating-change.png&quot; alt=&quot;Who&apos;s growing, who&apos;s shrinking&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The result is not simply a Black-to-white story or even a white-to-Hispanic story. It is a shift from a two-group state to a genuinely multiethnic one. The Shannon diversity index, which measures how evenly enrollment is distributed across racial groups, rose from 1.019 to 1.281. South Carolina&apos;s student body in 2026 is measurably more pluralistic than at any point in the data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The acceleration is real, but uneven&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Year-over-year declines in white share were remarkably consistent from 2016 to 2019, hovering between -0.42 and -0.49 percentage points per year. Then COVID hit. In 2021, the drop doubled to -0.84 points, the largest single-year shift in the dataset. After a partial snapback in 2022 (-0.39 points), the rate climbed again: -0.61 in 2023, -0.60 in 2024, and -0.87 in 2025, the steepest year on record.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-05-sc-majority-minority-accelerating-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;White share year-over-year decline&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2026 figure, -0.37 points, looks like a deceleration, but this follows the record -0.87 drop in 2025. One moderated year does not break the trend: the post-2020 average decline is -0.61 points per year, compared to -0.46 points in the pre-COVID era. At the current pace, white share will fall below 40% before 2035.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What is driving the shift&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three forces are reshaping South Carolina&apos;s classrooms simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most visible is Hispanic population growth. South Carolina is &lt;a href=&quot;https://dew.sc.gov/labor-market-information-blog/2026-02/south-carolina-records-fastest-population-growth-country&quot;&gt;the fastest-growing state in the country&lt;/a&gt;, adding nearly 80,000 residents between July 2024 and July 2025 alone, with 66,622 net domestic migrants. The state&apos;s Hispanic population &lt;a href=&quot;https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/south-carolina&quot;&gt;grew to roughly 436,000 by mid-2024&lt;/a&gt;, about 8% of the total population. But Hispanic students are 14.8% of the school-age population, nearly double their share of the overall population, reflecting higher birth rates and younger household composition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The growth is geographically concentrated. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/greenville-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greenville 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; added 6,764 Hispanic students since 2015, more than any other district. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/horry-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Horry 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; added 5,241, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/charleston-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Charleston 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; added 4,748, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/berkeley-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Berkeley 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; added 3,851. These four coastal and Upstate districts account for more than a third of the statewide Hispanic gain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-05-sc-majority-minority-accelerating-hispanic.png&quot; alt=&quot;Where Hispanic growth is concentrated&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But growth is also reshaping rural districts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/jasper-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Jasper 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is now 58.4% Hispanic. Saluda 01 is 48.0%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/beaufort-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Beaufort 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is 33.2%. In these communities, the classroom demographic arrived ahead of the political infrastructure to support it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second force is multiracial identification. The 73.2% surge in multiracial students since 2017 partly reflects families choosing the &quot;two or more races&quot; category who previously selected a single race. Federal reporting standards changed in 2010 to allow multiracial identification, and adoption has increased steadily since. Some of this growth represents genuine demographic change through interracial families; some is a reclassification of students who already existed in the system. The data cannot distinguish between the two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The third force is Black enrollment decline. Black students dropped from 36.7% to 30.0% of enrollment, a loss of 41,256 students. This decline exceeds the white loss in absolute terms and far exceeds it in percentage terms (-14.9% vs. -7.8%). The mechanisms here are less clear. South Carolina&apos;s overall population is growing, not shrinking. One contributing factor may be the growth of school choice. The state&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/programs/south-carolina-education-scholarship-trust-fund-program/&quot;&gt;Education Scholarship Trust Fund&lt;/a&gt; awarded all 10,000 ESA scholarships worth $7,500 each for 2025-26, with the cap rising to 15,000 for 2026-27. Declining birth rates among Black families nationally offer suggestive context, but no South Carolina-specific research directly links demographic change to this enrollment pattern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;11 districts crossed the line&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2015, 48 of South Carolina&apos;s 89 districts were majority-minority. By 2026, 50 of 81 districts are. The raw count has not moved much, but the composition has: 11 districts that were white-majority in 2015 have crossed to majority-minority.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/img/2026-03-05-sc-majority-minority-accelerating-districts.png&quot; alt=&quot;Majority-minority district count&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The largest flips are instructive. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/lexington-04&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Lexington 04&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; saw its white share fall from 66.2% to 45.8%, a 20.4-point drop, driven heavily by Hispanic growth (26.9% Hispanic share in 2026). &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/aiken-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Aiken 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; dropped from 53.4% to 42.0%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/anderson-05&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Anderson 05&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; went from 54.7% to 44.2%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/greenville-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greenville 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the state&apos;s largest district, crossed below 50% on its way from 56.5% to 47.4%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/dorchester-02&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Dorchester 02&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/sc/districts/berkeley-01&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Berkeley 01&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; both flipped, part of the broader Charleston metro transformation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are not urban-core districts. They are suburban and exurban communities in the state&apos;s growth corridors. The demographic shift is no longer confined to historically majority-Black rural districts. It is arriving in the districts where white families have been moving.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What this means for schools&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A state where no racial group holds a majority faces a different kind of operational challenge than one where a single group dominates. Bilingual education staffing, for example, is calibrated to a population that has nearly doubled in 12 years. Districts where Hispanic enrollment was 5% in 2015 and is 20% in 2026 have had to build language programs from scratch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fiscal question is equally pressing. South Carolina&apos;s school funding formula distributes weighted pupil allocations that adjust for student characteristics. A student body that is growing more diverse in linguistic background and shrinking in its historically largest groups creates a mismatch between the districts experiencing the most rapid change and the ones with the institutional capacity to absorb it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For Black enrollment, the 14.9% decline poses a separate set of questions. The state&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/data?reg=45&amp;amp;top=2&amp;amp;stop=10&amp;amp;lev=1&amp;amp;slev=4&amp;amp;obj=3&amp;amp;sreg=45&quot;&gt;Birth-to-Five data&lt;/a&gt; shows that 26.7% of births are to Black mothers, compared to 30.0% of current enrollment. The pipeline is narrowing. Whether this reflects families choosing private options, leaving the state, or declining birth rates is not yet clear from enrollment data alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Carolina did not reach a demographic plateau after crossing below 50% white in 2019. It accelerated past it. Every district in the state will get more diverse. The only variable is how soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>demographics</category></item><item><title>South Carolina Publishes 2025-26 Enrollment Data</title><link>https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-02-26-sc-publishes-2025-26-enrollment-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://sc.edtribune.com/sc/2026-02-26-sc-publishes-2025-26-enrollment-data/</guid><description>SCDE releases 2025-26 enrollment data showing 789,086 students statewide — down 7,694 from a record high, the first non-COVID decline in a decade.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series: South Carolina 2025-26 Enrollment.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A year ago, South Carolina&apos;s enrollment story was the opposite of most states. While neighbors bled students, South Carolina was growing. The state had fully recovered from COVID, added 30,000 students since 2014-15, and reached a record 796,780 in 2024-25. Administrators in Greenville and Charleston talked about capacity constraints, not closures. The 800,000 milestone felt inevitable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then the South Carolina Department of Education posted its &lt;a href=&quot;https://ed.sc.gov/data/other/student-counts/active-student-headcounts/2025-26-active-student-headcounts/&quot;&gt;2025-26 Active Student Headcounts&lt;/a&gt;, and the growth era ended: 789,086 public school students, down 7,694 from the prior year. That is the largest non-COVID enrollment loss in 12 years of state data, and the only decline year outside the pandemic since records begin in 2014-15. South Carolina came within 3,220 students of 800,000 and turned around. Whatever floor people thought they saw last year was not a floor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What the numbers open up&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The enrollment data covers approximately 114 districts, from suburban boomtowns on the Charlotte border to Corridor of Shame districts that have lost more than 40% of their students in a decade. Over the coming weeks, The SCEdTribune will unpack it in a series of data-driven articles. Here is what jumps out first.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;White students fell below 50% seven years ago. The gap keeps widening.&lt;/strong&gt; South Carolina crossed the majority-minority threshold in 2018-19, and in 2025-26 the white share fell to 45.8%. Hispanic enrollment has nearly doubled since 2014-15, adding 57,000 students while white enrollment dropped 24,000. The demographic transformation is accelerating, not leveling off.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Six districts have declined every year for 11 straight years.&lt;/strong&gt; Colleton, Darlington, Fairfield, McCormick, Marion, and Williamsburg counties have not gained a single student since 2014-15. Several sit along the I-95 corridor long known as the Corridor of Shame. McCormick has 483 students left.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Charter operators added 4,357 students while 61 traditional districts shrank.&lt;/strong&gt; The Charter Institute at Erskine has grown from 8,450 to 28,376 students since 2017-18, a 236% increase. Erskine alone added more students in 2025-26 than all but two traditional districts enrolled in total.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;By the numbers:&lt;/strong&gt; 789,086 students statewide in 2025-26 — down 7,694 from the prior year, a 1.0% decline and the first non-COVID enrollment loss in a decade of data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The threads we are following&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The coast just flipped.&lt;/strong&gt; Berkeley, Horry, and Charleston counties grew every year from 2015-16 through 2024-25. All three lost students in 2025-26. The reversal is sudden and synchronized, suggesting something structural rather than district-specific.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;South Carolina now enrolls fewer kindergartners than seniors.&lt;/strong&gt; The K-to-G12 ratio dropped below 100 for the first time in 2024-25 and fell further to 95.4 in 2025-26. Kindergarten is down 9.2% since 2014-15 while 12th grade is up 21.7%. The pipeline is shrinking from the bottom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Black enrollment fell 15% even as total enrollment grew.&lt;/strong&gt; Black students have gone from the largest racial group to the second-largest, losing 21,561 students since 2014-15 while Hispanic enrollment surged. The decline outpaces white losses in both absolute and percentage terms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What comes next&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the first in a series of articles examining what the 2025-26 enrollment data reveals about South Carolina public schools. New articles publish weekly on Thursdays.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The enrollment figures come from the &lt;a href=&quot;https://ed.sc.gov/data/other/student-counts/active-student-headcounts/&quot;&gt;SCDE Active Student Headcounts&lt;/a&gt;. The data covers headcount enrollment for public school districts statewide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded><category>enrollment</category></item></channel></rss>